Job sites need to make money too.
oDesk wouldn’t exist if it didn’t make money, and neither would its competitors. The business model is simple, connect buyers and providers and take a cut off the top. There’s more to it, but that’s fundamentally how they all work.
It’s much like an agency relationship and it works very well. Most sites take between ten and fifteen percent and provide various services ranging from escrow and payment through oDesk’s time management software. The benefit to this method of payment is that it’s performance based and so sites make more money by getting more work for providers.
Some sites have a second revenue stream–
Paid Memberships
Providers pay the site a monthly fee in return for additional benefits over the standard free membership.
On the surface it doesn’t sound like a bad idea, but in practice it does have one major drawback. It’s a significant change to the business model. It’s often easier to get a new provider to pay $10-15 per month than to get a buyer to pay $100-150 for a project. It also extends the site’s revenue stream to include funds form unsuccessful providers as well as successful ones.
Businesses reinforce success. This means that if they’re getting more money from subscription fees than project fees that’s where they will focus their money-making efforts.
There’s nothing wrong with this from a business perspective, but from a provider’s perspective there is a problem here: it dilutes the focus on getting new jobs.
Before we go further, let’s look at some examples of membership systems: eLance and GetaFreelancer both use paid subscriptions, but they take very different approaches.
A free member on eLance gets three bid points per month, and depending on the size of the project it can require anything up to four bid points to put in a bid. An individual membership is $9.95/month and gives the user 20 bid points and a lower commission percentage rate in addition to other benefits such as a greater number of keywords and more contact options.
A free member on GetAFreelancer has more bid points (I have 25) and pays a 10% commission on all jobs. The paid membership costs $12 a month, and not only provides more bid points, but also eliminates the commission. I’ve also never seen a job on GetAFreelancer that required more than one bid point.
Here’s where I see the difference: GetAFreelancer is rewarding paid members, while eLance is penalizing free members.
I’ve had a paid membership on GetAFreelancer, and only let it lapse because I haven’t been working there lately as my oDesk clients are taking up the majority of my work time. Should I shift focus back toward GetAFreelancer I will definitely restart my membership.
I haven’t gone for a paid membership on eLance, and part of that is because the free one is so restricting. My preference is to bootstrap my first job on a site to getting a membership, and with the restrictions on free members, I don’t spend much if any time applying for work on eLance.
That’s the real pitfall of paid memberships, they often make it hard for new providers to get started on a site.
Some might argue that it separates the serious providers from the frivolous but I’m not so sure. There are other ways to limit bids that don’t involve paid memberships and they seem to prevent frivolous and spam bids just as well as the memberships do.
Alternatives
oDesk uses a combination of skill tests and buyer feedback to limit the number of bid points available to a provider allotting anywhere from five to twenty points a week. The big benefit of this is that it’s possible to get to the maximum number of bid points right from the start just by taking skill tests, which helps new providers get started. Once a provider builds up a history it’s all based on feedback, but the skill system really helps get people in the door.
Rentacoder allows people as many bids as they can reasonably make. I don’t have a lot of experience at the site but I haven’t seen any complaints about spam bidders there.
Personally, I prefer the oDesk approach, but I don’t have a problem with the idea of paid memberships that reward paid members.
Just remember, it’s your time and your money, so be careful.
And for writers remember Yog’s Law.
- Specialize Your Way To The Top, And The Other Top Too
- Take Care of Your Tools
- Using Discipline and Determination
- Microsoft or Open Source?
- Why I Like oDesk

When I first started freelancing in 2000 I signed up for two or three ‘job sites’ purporting to give insider knowledge for freelances. After a year I let my membership lapse as I discovered that I could get more than enough work by just doing a bit of market research – anaylsing magazines and putting in proposals. Frankly, I found these sites a waste of money. Granted, I am more print than internet focused and people writing exclusively for the net may find them a bit more useful. Also, they are very US-focused so as a writer working from the UK and South Africa I found them a little alienating. I’m glad you’ve found them of some use.
Personally, I think you’re right that they’re more helpful for internet-focused freelancers rather than print-focused workers. I know there are a lot of freelancers out there who neither want nor need such sites; just as there are some who prefer working through these sites.
Having said that, I’d be leery of any site that claimed to offer “insider knowledge” for a paid membership. I think the real benefit of these sites are the payment and lead-generation services which can provide an excellent first step for people new to freelancing.
Thanks for commenting.
Hello, Regarding writing for jobs which I read on Thursday. I think we might disagree on this, but I still appreciate your comment on to Play: Job Sites and Paid Memberships – oDesk Insider.
A freelancer definitely has to be careful, because many sites charge hidden fees that aren’t noticable until it’s too late. For an up to date comparison of all the fees across all sites on the inudstry, please see:
http://www.rentacoder.com/RentACoder/DotNet/misc/CompetitorInformation/WhyRentACoder_ForSellers.aspx
Ian Ippolito
RentACoder.com